openclaw-pr-maintainer

OpenClaw PR Maintainer

• Requested issue/PR operation only. Root AGENTS.md: repair, product, source-trust, approval policy. This skill: GitHub workflow.
• Pasted ref ≠ publication permission or scope expansion.

Select the scope

• Review/triage/list: read-only; explain change/findings/proof/uncertainty. Edits, assignment, labels, comments, closes need authority.
• Fix only: investigate/repair/validate locally; publication needs ship/land or scoped equivalent.
• Land/ship/autonomous repair: source proof → review → native submission → verified merge. Track pending requests; repair CI/conflicts under same authority. Accepted auto-merge ≠ done. Preserve credit/unrelated work; root gates remain, no repeat routine permission.
• Queue/discovery: read triage. Batch live reads/shared discovery; named PR ≠ queue sweep.
• Author/regression attribution: author and provenance research; account age/history conditional.
• Lead hands-on; bounded useful workers, serialized checkout/refs + GitHub writes. No user-owned app tasks hiding internal subtasks. Preserve stalled worker patches/claims/proof before takeover/reassignment.

Inspect the actual item

• Start git status -sb; preserve unrelated work. Local gitcrawl → bare PATH gh, narrow live JSON. Stale/missing archive → gh, no broad sync. PR source: gh pr view/diff + checkout, not web search.

gh pr view <pr> --repo openclaw/openclaw \
  --json number,title,state,body,author,assignees,baseRefName,headRefName,headRefOid,files,comments,reviews
gh issue view <issue> --repo openclaw/openclaw \
  --json number,title,state,body,author,assignees,comments

• Assignment: triage, before deep work. Mention other assignees; preserve ownership. Account/activity research conditional.

Establish the outcome

• Read owner, entry points, callers, siblings, tests, docs, history, current main; inspect determining dependency contracts. Codex: root's personal source inspection. Contrary evidence → investigate before defending. No invented matrix/alternative.
• Already fixed: prove current-main repair; canonical commit/PR + matching source/runnable proof. Closure authority → comment evidence + close; otherwise report.
• Real defect: reproduce → repair owning invariant → prove path/siblings. Simplification over symptom guard; size/LOC ≠ correctness gate.
• Useful PR: improve editable branch; unsafe → authorized credited replacement before closure. Replaced ancestry → maintainer-owned replacement, never squash contributor PR.
• Uncertain/product decision: state gap; no speculative merge/automatic out-of-scope close.
• Proof + source-trust/host route: $openclaw-testing, landing. Focused proof → ready PR; PR CI = broad proof. Prefer bounded local proof on a qualified, available host. Deliberate remote proof can cover expensive checks or environment gaps; queues → stop task-owned allocation, use PR CI or a safe local scope, preserve uncovered requirements. Never execute untrusted source locally. Optional live gaps → meaningful boundary proof + limitation; explicit live, external API, authenticated-risk proof mandatory. Mocks/skips/old head ≠ live.
• Behavioral changes: boundary-proof contract + $test-audit. Requested behavior and repo standards: check separately.

CODEOWNERS review

• CODEOWNERS routes review; inspect live enforcement. Restricted/security paths + material product/behavior/security/ownership changes need listed-owner involvement.
• ownership/review governance: verified active organization-admin direction also qualifies; repository admin/bypass alone does not. Neither route waives enforced reviews.

Review and publish

• Before committing or landing nontrivial code: fresh review through permitted workflow; resolve actionable findings unless user opts out. Actionable = likely or high-impact; decline unlikely, recoverable edge cases whose fix adds disproportionate complexity, with one-line reason.

• Nontrivial code commit/landing: $autoreview; resolve verified actionable findings. Review-only: independent pass only when requested, no extra mandatory CLI pass.

• Reopen review for substantive changes/unresolved concerns, not patch-identical rebase/mechanical head change. Address real human/bot findings; explain rejections. Bot scores/Rank-up lists create no separate obligations. ClawSweeper advisory; never wait for comment to land.

• Current PR template: plain problem/impact; inventories in diff/details. Keep risks, migrations, actions, proof, gaps, credit current; explain material tradeoffs. No invented internal-only user benefit or universal LOC/provenance/alternate-fix essays.

• CHANGELOG.md release-owned; release-note context in PR/commit. Agent transcripts only on explicit request.

• Public mutation: verify author/committer + writer; shell-sensitive body files. Authorized scope only; update existing comment/body, no duplicates.

• Publication/merge: read landing (media, exact-head CI, native workflow).

• Verify remote merge/closure + source. Report problem, owning change, proof/gaps, credit, linked final state in prose; worthwhile follow-ups only.

Finalize and clean up

• Never remove worktree holding live session cwd, including yours or subdirectories. Child cd/cwd override does not move parent. Retain until owner exits/releases cwd; report path.
• Verified outcome → remove task logs, receipts, proof archives, .crabbox, scratch, finished worktrees via native closeout. No retention/archive/export/handoff just for removal.
• Remove created worktrees once work/PR lands, unless immediately needed next; never remove a live-cwd worktree.
• Every task: findings in chat/stdout; files only for deliverables/tool/proof/recovery needs, state purpose/reuse. Pre-merge proof mandatory; optional follow-ups never hold completion.
• Preserve requested deliverables/retention, unfinished source + necessary recovery state, active/live/unknown owners, credentials, agent state, shared dependencies.